Why mobile money has flopped in SA
In most jurisdictions, mobile money providers have not been regulated as fully fledged banks. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be high on the regulatory agenda in South Africa. By Genna Robb.
Anyone who has recently spent time in Kenya, Zimbabwe or Tanzania will have noticed the pervasive influence of mobile money on everyday life. People use it for a wide range of purposes from buying airtime to paying taxi drivers to making loan repayments.
Mobile money has revolutionised financial services in several African countries, lowering transaction costs, driving financial inclusion and providing consumers and small businesses with easy, cheap and safe ways to transact.
More than that, the experience in Kenya has shown that mobile money can be instrumental in bringing people into the formal economy, generating information on individuals’ transacting behaviour and thus creating better risk profiles — and a credit record — which can be used to offer them financial services that would otherwise be inaccessible.
The impact on financial inclusion is well documented, but it is not only the poor and unbanked in Kenya who use mobile payments. According to the GSMA, in 2014, 67% of transactions in Kenya’s National Payment System by volume were conducted using mobile money. Small businesses also use mobile payments as a way to pay their workers.
In Tanzania, mobile money was slower to take off, but is now growing fast. Competition is already providing benefits to consumers in terms of low prices and convenience. In 2014, the major mobile money providers in Tanzania reached an agreement to allow their platforms to interoperate so that customers can send money to recipients with mobile wallets on other networks. This development, unprecedented internationally, allows consumers to benefit from a much bigger payment network.
So, with such game-changing developments happening on our doorstep, the question for South Africa is: why are we so far behind? A number of attempts to launch mobile payments solutions have failed (including Vodacom’s M-Pesa), although recently both Vodacom and MTN have re-launched their services.
It is often pointed out that South Africa has a much more sophisticated financial system than other African markets and more people already have access to financial services. In addition, cheap means of transferring money already exist, such as Shoprite’s R9,99 service that allows customers to send money to any Shoprite branch in the country.
However, in 2014, according to the FinScope survey, 25% of adults in South Africa remained unbanked and of the 23% of adults who sent or received remittance transfers from friends or family within South Africa, the largest proportion, 32%, stated that they sent the cash with a relative or friend.
Another area that is often cited as holding back developments in South Africa is its rigid regulatory framework. Mobile money proponents cite the flexible approach of the Central Bank of Kenya as a key success factor for M-Pesa. There is no denying that the South African regime is harder to navigate for new entrants.
First of all, in the absence of a special dispensation for non-banks or e-money providers (which is the approach taken by the Tanzanian authorities, for example), payments providers in South Africa are treated as banks and subject to the full regulatory compliance requirements (and costs) associated with this.
This forces providers to partner with banks, necessitating complicated joint ventures where banks naturally would like to see the mobile money product do well, but not too well.
This approach is unnecessarily stringent and stifles innovation and disruption which would benefit consumers, especially the poor. In fact, mobile payments introduce very little risk into the payment system as the funds sent by customers are typically held in a trust account and not invested or on-lent by the mobile operators as would be done by a bank.
This is why, in most jurisdictions, mobile money providers have not been regulated as fully fledged banks, but regulators with an eye on financial inclusion have come up with a more proportionate regulatory response. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be high on the regulatory agenda in South Africa.
Fica regulations are another hurdle in South Africa, although here at least a more proportionate response to risk has prevailed. Exemption 17 allows clients to be registered for mobile money without proof of address or face-to-face ID verification as long as there is a low daily transaction limit.
The benefits that mobile money can bring through driving competition in the payments space are clear. In Tanzania, to send the equivalent of R500 from one M-Pesa account to another costs only R3,23. Also, mobile money delivers more than just cheap money transfers: the money can remain in the wallet and be used for other transactions such as purchasing electricity. On the back of mobile money platforms, providers can build other solutions and services such as credit and savings products.
If we truly want to create a more inclusive economy then creating the regulatory space, as other countries have done, for mobile money providers to innovate and compete is an important step.
- Genna Robb is a senior research fellow at the Centre for Competition, Regulation and Economic Development (CCRED) and an economist at DNA Economics
- CCRED will be hosting a public platform on mobile money on 22 July 2015. More details are available on the CCRED website