TopTV makes its case for porn

The troubled pay-TV operator has argued strongly that citizens have the right to view the material it wants to show and argues its systems will help protect children from viewing the content accidentally. By Duncan McLeod.

Eddie Mbalo

Eddie Mbalo

Financially distressed pay-television broadcaster On Digital Media (ODM), owner of TopTV, has set out a case to the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) in which it has argued that it should be allowed to broadcast X-rated content on its bouquet of satellite channels.

TopTV wants to broadcast three pornographic channels, namely Playboy TV, Desire TV and Private Space. Icasa in 2012 blocked a previous attempt by TopTV to launch the channels, arguing, among other things, that the rights of women to equality and human dignity trumped the broadcaster’s right to freedom of expression.

But TopTV came out fighting at public hearings at Icasa on Thursday. “In a democracy, adult citizens are free to make the choices that suit them within the rule of law,” said CEO Eddie Mbalo. “It is not the role of the state, the church, or any other body to dictate to people how they behave, as long as no one is harmed in the process.”

Mbalo pointed to statistics purporting to show that a majority (71%) of respondents polled in a survey — the 501 respondents were TopTV subscribers — indicated that they agreed that adults had the “right to watch pornography” in the privacy of their homes. A further 51% indicated they were likely to subscribe to an adult channel.

“The content does not contravene law on hate speech or incitement to violence. There is no law prohibiting the proposed adult content. In fact, we will show that refusal of channel authorisation would be unlawful and unconstitutional,” Mbalo said. In addition, TopTV argued that it had systems in place — including mandatory Pin codes — so that children would not be able to access the material.

Despite this, he said TopTV had decided to narrow its application to the effect that it would only broadcast the channels during the “watershed period” between 8pm and 5am. In addition, the channels would not be available to prepaid customers but rather only to contract viewers. There were also checks and balances to ensure subscribers were over 18 years of age.

Although TopTV is in financial difficulty, it argued at the Icasa hearings that it did not regard adult content as a “panacea” to solve its financial problems. “But it is a lucrative segment that could kick-start ODM’s recovery.”

In October 2012, the company’s management team decided to seek a “business rescue” under section 129 of the new Companies Act. This, it said at the time, would provide a “protective bubble” around it and “buy it some time to complete the search for a strategic equity partner”.

Several lobby groups, including Christian groupings, were scheduled to make presentations arguing against TopTV’s application during Thursday’s hearings.  — (c) 2013 NewsCentral Media

Share this article

  • http://profiles.google.com/gmccumskey Gareth McCumskey

    Let them show porn. What the hell? Why should this be an issue? I totally do not understand how this is a negative and why Icasa has be involved at all. We really need to do a bit more growing up in this country.

  • hkeller
  • http://www.facebook.com/letsholo Ofentse Letsholo

    lol… I support top tv… hey let the little guy compete with dstv… ;-)

  • Joel Sangster

    Failure to grasp the potentially negative effects of allowing this shows that you are the one that indeed, needs to grow up.

    Regardless of how useless/totalitarian you think Icasa is, that doesn’t take away from the fact that this is far from being a non-debatable issue.

  • http://twitter.com/colinza Colin Alston

    The so called “negative effects” people are raising have been debunked in every academic area. This is much simply religious groups trying to bully everyone to their point of view and ICASA pandering with their own beliefs. Because who would want to spend time debating the real causes of crime, rape, and objectification of women? Because when it comes to womens rights, religion is actually one of the worlds worst culprits.

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    Considering nothing has contributed to the pain and suffering of human beings as much as religion over the ages, I would question whether we should have religious channels on TV.

  • Cobus

    Next time you say with outrage, “what is wrong with this world?”…think about your opinion on this issue.

  • Pukes away

    sies

  • Dirk de Vos

    Has anyone heard of the internet? Of convergence? The stuff Top TV wants to show is like a Julie Andrews musical in comparison.

  • http://twitter.com/waynegemmell Wayne Gemmell

    ICASA must stick to their mandate and stop wasting time on frivolous issues like these. They have no right to dictate to us what we can or cannot watch.

  • Antonio

    Eddy – please sell Top TV to SABC and eTV. They can subsidise 5 million Top TV dishes and decoders to those in need for under R500-00 each. Use Sentech Terrestrial to provide decent internet services to all in South Africa.

  • Joel Sangster

    Generally, research cited by scientific publications like the above (I did read your link, did you read mine? probably not) pretty much always only focus on the correlation between porn and criminal activity. This casually ignores the effects on family, marriage, gender stereotypes, human trafficking, the list goes on. I’m not really that interested in debating more with you. The point I was making, is that this not a black and white issue and the religious groups opposing TopTv etc… have every right to do so.

Why TechCentral?

We know that as a prospective advertiser, you are spoilt for choice. Our job is to demonstrate why TechCentral delivers the best return for your advertising spend.

TechCentral is South Africa’s online technology news leader. We don’t say that lightly. We believe we produce the country’s best and most insightful online tech news aimed at industry professionals and those interested in the fast-changing world of technology.

We provide news, reviews and comment, without fear or favour, that is of direct relevance to our fast-expanding audience. Proportionately, we provide the largest local audience of all technology-focused online publishers.

We do not constantly regurgitate press releases to draw in search engine traffic — we believe websites that do so are doing their readers and advertisers a disservice. Nor do we sell “editorial features”, offer advertising “press offices” or rely on online bulletin-board forums of questionable value to advertisers to bolster our traffic.

TechCentral, which is edited and written by award-winning South African journalists, cares about delivering top-quality content to draw in the business and consumer readers that are of most interest to technology advertisers.

We’d like the opportunity to demonstrate the value of directing a portion of your advertising budget to TechCentral, whether your company is in the technology field or not. Numerous opportunities exist for companies interested in reaching our audience of key decision-makers in South Africa’s dynamic information and communications technology sector. We offer packages that will deliver among the best returns on investment available in the online technology news space.

For more information about advertising opportunities, and how your organisation can benefit by publicising itself on TechCentral, please call us on 011-792-0449 during office hours. Or send us an e-mail and ask for our latest rate card and brochure.