MTN seeks closed-door talks with parliament

This article was posted by on Oct 14th, 2009 and filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry using RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Karel PienaarCellphone operator MTN joined its rival Vodacom on Wednesday in committing to a closed-door session with the national assembly’s communications committee to discuss its cost structures.

MTN MD Karel Pienaar, pictured, made the commitment in writing to committee chairman Ismail Vadi during the committee’s public hearings on what it says is the excessive and exorbitant costs of mobile termination rates in the industry. These are the fees one network charges another for receiving calls on its network.

Vodacom agreed to a similar discussion with the committee during its presentation on Tuesday.

During the question and answer session following Pienaar’s presentation to the committee on Wednesday, some MPs again raised operators’ reluctance to discuss costs in the open committee.

Pienaar reminded the MPs of his commitment to a further in-confidence discussion on the issue. The main reason for that was not so much to do with MTN’s historic costs, he said.

“That we’re less worried to be public about it. It’s more to talk about, when you do cost analysis you need to look at the future and investments, and what that is. And there’s some confidentiality issues there that I don’t particularly want my competitors to know about,” Pienaar said.

The discussion about reducing costs was long overdue. “I think it’s one we need to prepare ourselves [for] so that we can break it down in a form that directly relates certain costs to what the impact would be.

“If we agree on a cost going forward, it does directly impact on how we define our investments. If you want to define your investments, you have to be very specific, hey I want to roll-out this and this higher speed data, this and this time.

“Now, I don’t think it’s in the interests of competition in this country that we communicate that and it certainly, commercially, could disadvantage me if I let my competitor know long beforehand what I am doing.”

Pienaar said MTN was also fully committed to working with the Independent Communications Authority of SA to reduce costs. “We are absolute committed to that process, have contributed to that process, continue to… We are meeting again next Friday on that process, so we are committed.

“In my mind, it’s just the amount and the steepness, and speed [of the reduction] that we’re really discussing. We all accept that interconnect has to come down, it has to change.

“It hasn’t changed for a long time, it needs to take the new cost and cost environments [into account]. We need to go through the process and come to a new number and that’s the process we’re committed to,” he said.  — Sapa

Subscribe to our free daily newsletter



  • Ed Runhar

    There is a ten thousand pound gorilla in the room and no one can see it? HOW??? “Closed door talks”? This means that they have something to hide. This also insinuates that the figures they publish in their financial results are not either not accurate or misrepresentation of the actual business. How can this be allowed to go on? ICASA is full of lawyers and with absolutely no expertise in corporate finance. Little wonder these telcos are dancing circles around them (ICASA).

  • Kim Coward

    MTN’s CEO is a smooth talking wolf. I was at the hearings and everything that he said was shot down at some time or other. also I believe he made a mockery of the committee when asked if he had a meeting with Vodacom since the first meeting in 1993. and he was warned of the consequences of his answer. He did not answer the question directly. but described a piece of paper his collegue had pushed in front of him which had the word no on it. No one recognised that he had not answered the question directly. sSecondly that in 1999 was when both MTN and Vodacom had pushed up the MTR rates exactly the same it was not designed to push Cell C out. because Cell C only came into the market in 2001. But the truth is that Cell C was in litigation with ICASA for 2 years or else they would have been in the market in 1999. So it is clear to me the timing of the large MTR hike was to designed to cripple Cell C.
    Furthermore the commitee did not ask the question to both Vodacom and MTN if they colluded with Telkom seperatly who at the time owned some 50% of Vodacom. also the CEO of MTN said that all the profit of the cell phone network side of MTN group profits of some R8 billion was reinvested in SA infrastructure. According to the MTN group they spent some R28 bilion on Capex which includes infrastucture throughout Africa. which I find hard to believe as a communications engineer, that he would spend 30% of capex on an existing profitable market and spend 70% on establishing a market throught some 8 different new countries which is less than 10% per country . the numbers don’t add up. Also MTN has made an average of 40% pretax profit year on year which is unheard of worldwide. To me it is sheer profiteering bordering on anti competitivness. this is why they want talks behind closed doors. they have plenty to hide from the public.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • Greg Mahlknecht: Are you sure you aren’t replacing 25W downlighters with those Ellies?  I got some to check...
  • Brian: Weslite sent me their catalog and price list this morning.  The pricing seemed very reasonable and they are in...
  • Theunis De Klerk: I have started replacing my downlights with LED ones. Started with the Osram ones, but at R200, too...
  • Greg Mahlknecht: Great, thanks – Makro’s a bit far away from me, but I see ACDC is just a few mins away,...
  • Wayne Gemmell: I bought a simple LED globe to replace a globe in my lounge. The thing was so dim that I eventually...

Advertisement
Advertisement

TechCentral is proudly hosted by:




Log in / (c) 2009 - 2012 NewsCentral Media