Troubling times for Microsoft

Microsoft is under pressure from all sides. On the Web, Google is eating its lunch. In smartphones and tablets, it’s struggling to gain traction against Apple and others. And amid all this, its traditional PC business is shrinking. By Duncan McLeod.

Duncan McLeod

Duncan McLeod

Fans of the open-source Firefox Web browser, developed by the Mozilla Foundation, have long enjoyed the “Easter egg” in the software that takes a dig at Microsoft and its browser, Internet Explorer (IE). Typing in “about:mozilla” in the address bar has always brought up some clever, pretend-religious phrase that suggests the independent Web browser is making headway.

In the latest Firefox version the text reads in part: “And they built a new world in their own image as promised by the sacred words, and spoke of the beast with their children. Mammon awoke, and lo! It was naught but a follower.”

Mammon and the beast both symbolise Microsoft, which Firefox’s developers would have us believe is now no more than a follower in the browser market it once dominated.

There is truth in this. According to figures from StatCounter, Google’s Chrome has overtaken IE as the world’s most popular Web browser, with market share in January of 31,4% across desktop and mobile devices. IE, whose market share was once north of 90%, is second with 26,4%.

But it’s not only in browsers where Microsoft has come under intense pressure over the past decade. Fifteen years ago, the company dominated the technology industry. But with the Web and the rise of the use of consumer technology in business — especially smartphones and tablets — its power and reach have been reduced significantly.

Microsoft’s waning influence is perhaps illustrated most dramatically in its share price and its market capitalisation versus those of its rivals. At its peak in December 1999, Microsoft was worth US$615bn. Admittedly, that was three months before the dot-com bubble burst, but its share price has languished ever since, while the valuations of Apple and even Google have surpassed it.

The principal challenge Microsoft faces is that the PC — where it still dominates with Windows and, in corporate environments, with Office — is no longer what’s driving consumer demand for technology.

Gartner research shows that worldwide PC shipments in the fourth quarter of 2012 fell by 4,9%. Analyst Mikako Kitagawa says tablets, like Apple’s iPad, have “dramatically changed the device landscape for PCs, not so much by cannibalising PC sales, but by causing PC users to shift consumption to tablets rather than replacing older PCs”.

In emerging markets, millions of users — and possibly even billions — may never use a PC. Rather, they’ll get online using smartphones, whose cost is plummeting.

Microsoft is all too aware of these threats. The latest version of Windows has been redesigned from the ground up for tablets and other devices with touch screens. Microsoft is attempting, too, to mount a comeback in the mobile phone market with Windows Phone, though it faces an uphill battle against Apple at the high end of the market and against Google, with Android, across the board.

In emerging markets, it recently unveiled 4Afrika, a $70m initiative aimed at getting tens of millions of Windows Phone-based smart devices in the hands of young Africans, developing technology skills and assisting small businesses. Of course, these are things Google has been doing for some time.

The question is why it took the company so long to react. In the 1990s, when Microsoft woke up to the threat of the Web, Bill Gates set about retooling the company for a new era — and succeeded. Can it do it again under Steve Ballmer, Gates’s successor? Ballmer is trying hard, but the challenges are bigger now. And Microsoft is a larger, more bureaucratic place than it was when Gates ordered his troops to the battle stations 15 years ago.  — (c) 2013 NewsCentral Media

Share this article

  • http://twitter.com/k1d_bl4ck Werner Venter

    the day M$ drops Trident for WebKit… there will be a mini christmas for developers worldwide…

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    Terrible idea… Webkit already does many things its own way, even top sites like takelot have fallen into the quick and easy -webkit CSS extension trap. Having one dominant browser engine that developers code for will just be IE6 all over again. We need alternate engines to keep everyone honest. This is ultimately the W3C’s fault for being so glacially slow, but again – that’s the exact same reason IE6 got into the non-standards state it was.

    Don’t even get started on the abysmal state of Webkit on the mobile platforms, every version of every mobile OS seems to have a different version with its own special little problems.

  • http://twitter.com/k1d_bl4ck Werner Venter

    not disputing it… just not Trident. Lets have gecko and webkit and whatever else… just not Trident. its abysmal,.

    And the mobile pseudo-fragmentation you mention is easier to deal with than having vastly incoherent renderers…

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    >not disputing it… just not Trident. Lets have gecko and webkit and whatever else… just not Trident. its abysmal,.

    That opinion’s about 2 years out of date. IE9′s Trident was excellent, and IE10′s is even better – calling IE10′s rendering “abysmal” is showing how out of touch you are. I’d say it’s comfortably better than Gecko, which has been going downhill since Google stole away so many of its top devs to work on Chrome.

    >And the mobile pseudo-fragmentation you mention is easier to deal with than having vastly incoherent renderers…

    No. Exhibit A: IE6. How did that turn out? Everyone should just code to the standard. Do that and you’ll get the same site. Start using all the CSS extensions, and at some point your site is guaranteed to break. After the functionality an extension provides is eventually finalized by the W3C, and it’s usually implemented differently, devs almost never go back and update their sites.

  • http://twitter.com/k1d_bl4ck Werner Venter

    >That opinion’s about 2 years out of date. IE9′s Trident was excellent, and IE10′s is even better – calling IE10′s rendering “abysmal” is showing how out of touch you are.

    Go back to school –> http://www.neowin.net/news/html5-game-developer-feels-ie10-lacks-important-features

    >No. Exhibit A: IE6. How did that turn out? Everyone should just code to the standard. Do that and you’ll get the same site. Start using all the CSS extensions, and at some point your site is guaranteed to break. After the functionality an extension provides is eventually finalized by the W3C, and it’s usually implemented differently, devs almost never go back and update their sites.

    Yes…. If you develop like your arse and dont detect browsers / use modernizr / wurfl or any of the zillion other methods to ensure multiplatform rendering.

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    >Go back to school

    That’s a WebGL vs 2D rendering test. Are you just trolling now? WebGL isn’t a ratified standard. This is exactly the problem I’m talking about. If that’s the best you can do, then I rest my case. Condemning a rendering engine because it doesn’t implement a non-standard once again highlights that you don’t even understand the problem!

    >Yes…. If you develop like your arse and dont detect browsers / use modernizr / wurfl or any of the zillion other methods to ensure multiplatform rendering

    Again, I don’t see how you fail to realise that you’ve just offered the problem as a solution to the problem! Developers should have to do nothing for multiplatform rendering, except take into account the screen size. wurfl, etc came about for the exact reason that those awful custom browsers on featurephones really ARE abysmal.

    Microsoft’s position is clear – from now on, they’ll only implement standards once they’re final. They did with IE6 what Chrome/FF are doing today, and got burned. It never fails to amaze me the double standards and short memories people have.

  • John Mitchell

    A good read Duncan, thanks for the insight.

Why TechCentral?

We know that as a prospective advertiser, you are spoilt for choice. Our job is to demonstrate why TechCentral delivers the best return for your advertising spend.

TechCentral is South Africa’s online technology news leader. We don’t say that lightly. We believe we produce the country’s best and most insightful online tech news aimed at industry professionals and those interested in the fast-changing world of technology.

We provide news, reviews and comment, without fear or favour, that is of direct relevance to our fast-expanding audience. Proportionately, we provide the largest local audience of all technology-focused online publishers.

We do not constantly regurgitate press releases to draw in search engine traffic — we believe websites that do so are doing their readers and advertisers a disservice. Nor do we sell “editorial features”, offer advertising “press offices” or rely on online bulletin-board forums of questionable value to advertisers to bolster our traffic.

TechCentral, which is edited and written by award-winning South African journalists, cares about delivering top-quality content to draw in the business and consumer readers that are of most interest to technology advertisers.

We’d like the opportunity to demonstrate the value of directing a portion of your advertising budget to TechCentral, whether your company is in the technology field or not. Numerous opportunities exist for companies interested in reaching our audience of key decision-makers in South Africa’s dynamic information and communications technology sector. We offer packages that will deliver among the best returns on investment available in the online technology news space.

For more information about advertising opportunities, and how your organisation can benefit by publicising itself on TechCentral, please call us on 011-792-0449 during office hours. Or send us an e-mail and ask for our latest rate card and brochure.