Microsoft goes DIY in tablet war

The software giant has opted to make its own tablets to compete with Apple’s iPad, but can it catch up? Craig Wilson investigates.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

The battle for the tablet computer market became much more intense on Monday, with Microsoft breaking with its past approaches and announcing it was developing its own line of tablets, to be called Surface.

The company offered a preview of a pair of tablets that it intends manufacturing itself, a risky move given Microsoft’s checkered history in the hardware market.

Microsoft plans to offer two Surface tablets, one running its Metro-only version of Windows 8 for Arm-based processors, which it’s calling Windows RT. The second, more powerful tablet, will run an Intel Core i5 chip and offer the full Windows 8 Pro version of its upcoming operating system. (More details are available on Microsoft’s website.)

CEO Steve Ballmer says Surface “embodies the notion of hardware and software really pushing each other” and that it represents a “whole new family” of devices for Microsoft.

Apple’s iPad remains the dominant tablet computer worldwide, but devices powered by Google’s Android operating system and manufactured by companies such as Samsung and HTC have been gaining traction.

There was no doubt that Windows 8-powered tablets were looming, but many expected they would come exclusively from Microsoft’s hardware partners.

Dimitri Tserpes, chief technology officer at technology group Mustek, says Microsoft’s move is “interesting”. However, he’s concerned that the announcement didn’t include more information about pricing, release date and retail partnerships for the Surface devices.

The tablet market is a “volume game”, says Tserpes. “You want to see someone like Walmart saying it’ll take a million pieces, otherwise you won’t make a dent in Apple.”

Tserpes says it would’ve made more sense to have retailers on board first, with “stock to the ceilings” and to offer consumers information on availability. He says the question to ask is whether the Surface range is sufficiently appealing that consumers will “want one tomorrow”.

One of Apple’s strengths is that it converts hype into sales by announcing products along with release dates and, more often than not, the ability to preorder devices.

“I’m not sure the Surface tablets are revolutionary enough to convert the hype into sales when it is released,” Tserpes says. “It’s not enough for me, but then, neither was the new iPad. The iPad 2, on the other hand, was really exciting. It was a real progression from the first iPad.”

Microsoft’s biggest challenge is making its ecosystem exciting again, he says. The company has become somewhat “dry” and with its new products, and Windows 8, it will have to reinvigorate consumers about the brand.

Ryan Smit, head of digital consumer division at research and consulting firm BMI-TechKnowledge, says the move is sensible insofar as it “gets the ball rolling for Windows 8 tablets”. He says the Surface devices should be viewed like the Nexus devices from Google — a product that sets the standard for other manufacturers.

In this sense, he says the move may not annoy Microsoft’s hardware partners as much as some worry it will because companies like Samsung can manufacture devices to Microsoft’s specifications.

“Many expected Microsoft would partner with Nokia on the first Windows 8 tablet, but I suspect Nokia will be the next brand to bring out something in the same league,” Smit says.

He says it’s concerning that no release date for the new tablets has been announced because it gives Microsoft’s competitors more time to respond and consumers more time to buy competing devices in the interim.

Microsoft suggests that pricing of the Surface devices will be similar to that of competing devices and Smit says the company seems intent to compete on differentiating design elements and functionality rather than price.

He says Microsoft’s announcement will please those who remain “reluctant to move away from the Windows environment” and may appeal more to those looking for a complete replacement device for their personal laptop.

Although some have argued that Microsoft wants to target the enterprise market, where it’s strong, Smit says building a tablet means targeting both consumers and enterprise customers from the outset. He says consumers increasingly dictate what devices enterprises use, and that the best bet at infiltrating enterprises is by simply building the best device.

“From an enterprise point of view, the question will still be there as to how tablets fit into company systems and what exactly they’re used for, regardless of the brand,” says Smit. “There has to be a rationale for tablet deployment, whether it’s supplementing or replacing other devices. Companies aren’t going to buy tablets just for the sake of it.”  — (c) 2012 NewsCentral Media

Share this article

  • Brian Seligmann

    From the official MS press release

    “Conceived, designed and engineered entirely by Microsoft employees, and
    building on the company’s 30-year history manufacturing hardware,
    Surface is designed to seamlessly transition between consumption and
    creation, without compromise.”

    I’m not convinced that their 30 year pedigree in manufacturing hardware is anything to brag about.  What have they made that was really successful?  A range of mice (mouses?)?

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    There’s a little device called the Xbox 360.  Early hardware issues aside, it has to be counted as successful. 

    go to ” Microsoft . com / hardware ” if you want to see more.  They do tons of stuff.  Most their hardware is pretty good, they don’t aim at the bottom end of the market.   I’ve used their natural keyboards for decades.  I’ve yet to find its equal.

  • Brian Seligmann

    Point taken (and we often forget that Xbox 360 is MS) but Tablets are a world away from input devices.

    Don’t get me wrong – I’m a total Apple fanatic but I’m also certain that the Enterprise market is going to embrace a device that actually does Enterprise computing/connectivity properly.  I’m just not yet convinced that MS are the best company to build the hardware.  One question – Can MS be as good at controlling the end-to-end process as Apple?  History says “no” but then Apple almost went bankrupt doing the same thing and then turned themselves around to the the current success story that they are.  How much of Apple is Engineering & Marketing and how much was Steve Jobs?  The iPad 3 isn’t, IMHO, a very exciting device and Tim Cook has not yet proven that he can fill Steve’s shoes.

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    >>One question – Can MS be as good at controlling the end-to-end process as Apple?
     
    Probably not, at least not initially – Tim Cook is amazing at that, but MS have put out enough Xbox 360’s, and improved that design/reliability so much in the past few years, it’s clear they’re learning fast.  Hopefully they can apply that knowledge to their tablets.
     
    >>How much of Apple is Engineering & Marketing and how much was Steve Jobs? The iPad 3 isn’t, IMHO, a very exciting device and Tim Cook has not yet proven that he can fill Steve’s shoes.
     
    All Microsoft need is one guy that’s amazing at design.  They have to be out there, and they were singing the designer’s praises.  I bet he’s got a similar looking phone design prototyped somewhere!

    Microsoft always fall down on marketing, though – it always astounds me how such a big company can be so bad at it.  And it’s always been like that.  If they ever did buy Nokia, the most valuable asset they’d get would be their marketing department!

  • ps246

    anyone remember the zune? didn’t think so.

Why TechCentral?

We know that as a prospective advertiser, you are spoilt for choice. Our job is to demonstrate why TechCentral delivers the best return for your advertising spend.

TechCentral is South Africa’s online technology news leader. We don’t say that lightly. We believe we produce the country’s best and most insightful online tech news aimed at industry professionals and those interested in the fast-changing world of technology.

We provide news, reviews and comment, without fear or favour, that is of direct relevance to our fast-expanding audience. Proportionately, we provide the largest local audience of all technology-focused online publishers.

We do not constantly regurgitate press releases to draw in search engine traffic — we believe websites that do so are doing their readers and advertisers a disservice. Nor do we sell “editorial features”, offer advertising “press offices” or rely on online bulletin-board forums of questionable value to advertisers to bolster our traffic.

TechCentral, which is edited and written by award-winning South African journalists, cares about delivering top-quality content to draw in the business and consumer readers that are of most interest to technology advertisers.

We’d like the opportunity to demonstrate the value of directing a portion of your advertising budget to TechCentral, whether your company is in the technology field or not. Numerous opportunities exist for companies interested in reaching our audience of key decision-makers in South Africa’s dynamic information and communications technology sector. We offer packages that will deliver among the best returns on investment available in the online technology news space.

For more information about advertising opportunities, and how your organisation can benefit by publicising itself on TechCentral, please call us on 011-792-0449 during office hours. Or send us an e-mail and ask for our latest rate card and brochure.