<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interconnect: &#8216;the real story&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/</link>
	<description>South Africa&#039;s technology news leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ipkwena</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>ipkwena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-511</guid>
		<description>In all fairness, blaming AKC is not a meaningful approach. We all should know the responsibilities CEOs have towards their so called primary shareholders. AKC position on this matter is simple, there is room to change the paradigm and the regulator must simply carry out its mandate.

In my opinion, interconnect rates should be zero cents. Accepting traffic from another operator means one already has capacity to receive, transport and terminate it. Otherwise do not accept it in the first it and rather expand yuour network first.

But I guess it is not as easy as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, blaming AKC is not a meaningful approach. We all should know the responsibilities CEOs have towards their so called primary shareholders. AKC position on this matter is simple, there is room to change the paradigm and the regulator must simply carry out its mandate.</p>
<p>In my opinion, interconnect rates should be zero cents. Accepting traffic from another operator means one already has capacity to receive, transport and terminate it. Otherwise do not accept it in the first it and rather expand yuour network first.</p>
<p>But I guess it is not as easy as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riaan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-142</guid>
		<description>From this i can only deduce that without a regulator stading over big business, business will go on raping a nation until somebody tells them to stop.

Vodacom and MTN had lots of time to review the cost and bring to down to resonable profit. But ya, theres no thing as resonable profit in the SA telecoms industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this i can only deduce that without a regulator stading over big business, business will go on raping a nation until somebody tells them to stop.</p>
<p>Vodacom and MTN had lots of time to review the cost and bring to down to resonable profit. But ya, theres no thing as resonable profit in the SA telecoms industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRoDent</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRoDent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Indeed Mr. Knott Craig.

Isn&#039;t retrospect a wonderful thing. However, you have yourself personally profited very nicely from a regime that you now criticize at such an &quot;arms length&quot;.

Pot. Kettle. Black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed Mr. Knott Craig.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t retrospect a wonderful thing. However, you have yourself personally profited very nicely from a regime that you now criticize at such an &#8220;arms length&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pot. Kettle. Black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-78</guid>
		<description>AKC, your 27 paragraphs do nothing to erase the fact that you were at the helm of Vodacom when MTN and Vodacom raised interconnect rates. It&#039;s just silly for you to pretend you now care about &quot;making telecoms less of a burden and more of an economic catalyst in our economy&quot;, and no-one is buying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AKC, your 27 paragraphs do nothing to erase the fact that you were at the helm of Vodacom when MTN and Vodacom raised interconnect rates. It&#8217;s just silly for you to pretend you now care about &#8220;making telecoms less of a burden and more of an economic catalyst in our economy&#8221;, and no-one is buying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-76</guid>
		<description>AKC, why start the interconnect debate now, why not why you were still at Vodacom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AKC, why start the interconnect debate now, why not why you were still at Vodacom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gale</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t exclude divine intervention Mr Walsh, just wouldn&#039;t bank on it! 

I understand that accurately determining the fair cost of delivering a call is not trivial - any telecoms product manager will attest to that.  There are a myriad of technology cost, network topology and convergent product issues to contend with to start with. I cannot believe though that there are not sufficiently smart financial minds in the MNOs to have come up with some near-as-dammit figures? 

It has obviously not been in the interest of the MNOs to do anything about it.  And quite frankly, when one considers the premiums charged for SMSs (never seen as a potential revenue stream to begin with and now as high as 15% of total revenue in some cases?) and roaming (so easy to fleece someone else&#039;s customer!) one has to be skeptical that interconnect rates as proposed and defended by MNOs are anywhere near what they should be.

With the lion&#039;s share of the national customer base the MNOs have the clout to raise the barrier to entry for new players whose potential customers need to call... ah yes, the MNO&#039;s customers!

Your comment about efficiency is very valid - there is not enough incentivising ALL the players to become more efficient.  And we still sit with mobile rates where it can be more expensive to call your wife on her mobile than to call your brother in &quot;exile&quot; across the globe. 

I think some significant drops in interconnect rates over the next few years would be just one of a number of steps to making telecoms less of a burden and more of an economic catalyst in our economy.

Good to see some new voices writing for Techcentral  -look forward to more insights from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t exclude divine intervention Mr Walsh, just wouldn&#8217;t bank on it! </p>
<p>I understand that accurately determining the fair cost of delivering a call is not trivial &#8211; any telecoms product manager will attest to that.  There are a myriad of technology cost, network topology and convergent product issues to contend with to start with. I cannot believe though that there are not sufficiently smart financial minds in the MNOs to have come up with some near-as-dammit figures? </p>
<p>It has obviously not been in the interest of the MNOs to do anything about it.  And quite frankly, when one considers the premiums charged for SMSs (never seen as a potential revenue stream to begin with and now as high as 15% of total revenue in some cases?) and roaming (so easy to fleece someone else&#8217;s customer!) one has to be skeptical that interconnect rates as proposed and defended by MNOs are anywhere near what they should be.</p>
<p>With the lion&#8217;s share of the national customer base the MNOs have the clout to raise the barrier to entry for new players whose potential customers need to call&#8230; ah yes, the MNO&#8217;s customers!</p>
<p>Your comment about efficiency is very valid &#8211; there is not enough incentivising ALL the players to become more efficient.  And we still sit with mobile rates where it can be more expensive to call your wife on her mobile than to call your brother in &#8220;exile&#8221; across the globe. </p>
<p>I think some significant drops in interconnect rates over the next few years would be just one of a number of steps to making telecoms less of a burden and more of an economic catalyst in our economy.</p>
<p>Good to see some new voices writing for Techcentral  -look forward to more insights from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Nicely written and an excellent insight into the convoluted operations of all our telecoms operators. 

No idea of costs after 115 years? Sounds spot on. 

Thanks, looking forward to more from TechCentral of this quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely written and an excellent insight into the convoluted operations of all our telecoms operators. </p>
<p>No idea of costs after 115 years? Sounds spot on. </p>
<p>Thanks, looking forward to more from TechCentral of this quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/interconnect-the-real-story-2/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcentral.co.za/?p=555#comment-5</guid>
		<description>From your lips to God&#039;s ears</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From your lips to God&#8217;s ears</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

