How ‘white spaces’ could spark a tech revolution

[By Duncan McLeod]

A Sandton hotel played host to a conference last week on “white-spaces spectrum”. For nontechnical people, it was a fairly arcane discussion. But what was being talked about could usher in the biggest revolution in telecommunications since the mobile phone.

Next time you’re tuning a television set into terrestrial broadcasts, pause and think about the snowy picture you get before it latches onto the stations you’re looking for. What you’re seeing — in many cases — are the “guard bands” between analogue channels, established to prevent interference between different broadcasts.

Now technology has advanced to the point where wireless broadband providers believe they can use these guard bands — these gaps between television channels — to offer telecoms services.

And there’s a growing lobby — in the US, Europe and elsewhere — to make this spectrum available on a licence-exempt basis to anyone. Already, UK regulator Ofcom is overseeing field trials in Scotland and Cambridge. Ofcom is keen to move ahead with opening up the white spaces by next year.

There are a number of reasons to be exceptionally excited about this. Firstly, the spectrum is ideally suited to providing broadband in rural areas, which haven’t been adequately served by the large, licensed telecoms operators. Secondly, and arguably more importantly, making this spectrum available to anyone who wants to use it could spur untold innovation in the technology industry.

Consider the incredible innovation that’s taken place around the 2,4GHz band, which is also licence-exempt in most of the world. Opening this band led to the widespread adoption of Wi-Fi, among other technologies. As one delegate at last week’s conference said, no one in their right mind would buy a laptop computer or smartphone without integrated Wi-Fi. It’s changed the way we work.

So imagine what opening up the vast chunks of spectrum in the VHF and UHF bands could achieve. Some broadcasters, not surprisingly, are already crying foul, warning of interference between telecoms operators and television signals. And their concerns do need to be taken into consideration. But opening up white-spaces spectrum mustn’t be held back by endless field trials.

So far signs are good that SA could be an early leader. The Independent Communications Authority of SA has said it’s keen for a trial, and Google has said it’s keen to provide financial and technical support.

The presence of senior Google and Microsoft representatives at the Sandton conference shows how seriously the tech giants are taking this opportunity. Icasa and government cannot be allowed to dawdle in formulating the necessary policies and regulations.

White-spaces spectrum, used in conjunction with something called “super Wi-Fi” — better known to the engineering types as the IEEE 802.22 standard — has the potential to bring fast Internet access to areas that were previously regarded as uneconomical. Using “cognitive” radio techniques, the technology promises devices that can access spectrum without causing interference with terrestrial broadcasters.

Henk Kleynhans, an outspoken proponent of white-spaces spectrum, says it will boost entrepreneurship, innovation and technology skills development. More importantly, it promises a way, for the first time, to bridge the digital divide. Its importance cannot be understated.

Often, SA entrepreneurs are ready and willing to lead from the front when it comes to technology innovation, only to be thwarted by slow policy and regulatory decision-making.

Opening up white-spaces spectrum is of paramount importance. It would be unfortunate if red tape and indecision hold back the country’s innovators.

Share this article

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001810003107 Jim Carlson

    I agree this is a good solution for South Africa and anywhere that has environmental obstacles to wireless deployment. I wanted to let you know that Arcata-based hardware firm Carlson is partnering with  Neul, a software firm in the UK, to produce an even faster, more affordable white space broadband radio than the ones each company currently produces. This new product is set to be internationally available by the end of the year. http://www.carlsonwireless.com

  • Karl_Muller

    No form of pollution has proliferated like electromagnetic smog over the last decade or so. And the health effects of this bombardment are only just emerging.

    Every new frequency used has the capacity to trigger some new health problem — whether it be a brainwave frequency, or a calcium efflux frequency from the cell, or the wavelength just resonating with some body part, like the eyeball — each new radiation type creates its own effects.

    Allowing all the “white space” to be used for communication will only see a rise in illnesses and social pathology — rages, depression, suicide, you name it. But there is no chance of anyone stopping this technology until complete disaster strikes. Not a single thought is given to the effects on the environment.

  • Anonymous

    I have yet to read any conclusive evidence that cellular signals cause any negative impact on human health. I have read extensively on the subject since we met a few years ago and I have yet to come across a single reliable scientific study that proves any negative impact on human health. In fact, there appears to be no credible evidence that the low levels of non-ionising radiation produced by cellphone signals have any harmful effects whatsoever. It’s more dangerous to stand in direct sunlight for a few minutes.

    I call quackery.

  • http://twitter.com/thewomble_za Greg Mahlknecht

    >>Allowing all the “white space” to be used for communication will only see a rise in illnesses and social pathology

    If the frequencies all around these white spaces have been used for decades, why hasn’t this happened yet?  Or do you think all the world’s problems are due to TV broadcasts?  Or perhaps the randomly allocated frequecies, by a stroke of immense luck, happen to all be on frequencies that don’t affect us?

    >>Not a single thought is given to the effects on the environment.     

    If this is true, why are the service providers the world over always moan about how long it takes, and how much they have to do to get environmental impact studies done?

    How long is “long enough” to study, and will you ever be satisfied with any test the scientific community can come up with?  Or will you keep finding other things to blame on radiation?  Perhaps it contributed to the particularly large outbreak of fleas my dog suffered this spring – I’ve yet to see a study conclusively proving it doesn’t increase the reproductive rate of fleas.

    All this brings me back to the question I always wonder about – what do you propose? What’s the end-game of you anti-radiation crowd – are you wanting to eliminate all forms of wireless communication and broadcasting from the earth?

  • http://twitter.com/Arfness Andrew Fraser

    I’m always surprised at how these anti-EM campaigners state with such certainty that EM radiation causes negative effects, and hysterically shout about the health effects in the most emotive language… but then can offer no objective evidence of the impact.

    There are to my knowledge, no ( nada, zero, zip) scientifically conducted studies that have indicated a direct causal link between electromagnetic radiation at the levels used for telecommunication and negative health effects.  

    The hysteria is clearly demonstrated in your post above, Karl.  These frequency bands have been used for decades for the transmission of TV signals (at much higher average power levels than telecommunications on 802.22) .  South Africa started broadcasts in the 70s, I’d think that the effects would be noticed by now.  Or are you arguing that, by some obscene twist of fate, that only the guard channel frequencies are dangerous?

    Lastly, when you tune into these frequencies on your TV, you may notice a lot of static or EM noise – that’s the sound of the universe.  The earth has been bombarded by electromagnetic waves in these frequencies, every second of every day, since its formation.  If these were so harmful, you don’t think that we’d notice?

    If you are genuinely concerned, I can assist with a very stylish range of aluminum foil head protection apparel.

  • Watcher

    It is probably worth pointing out that the current analogue TV transmitters pump out 100′s of kiloWatts of RF power, and have been doing so since the mid-1970s.  The telecom kit working in the white spaces is likely to be both frequency agile and at power levels measured in Watts.  Putting it in other terms, the TV transmitters are like the speaker stacks at a rock concert while the whitespace transmitters will be music from your cellphone speaker.  The incremental impact will be zip….

Why TechCentral?

We know that as a prospective advertiser, you are spoilt for choice. Our job is to demonstrate why TechCentral delivers the best return for your advertising spend.

TechCentral is South Africa’s online technology news leader. We don’t say that lightly. We believe we produce the country’s best and most insightful online tech news aimed at industry professionals and those interested in the fast-changing world of technology.

We provide news, reviews and comment, without fear or favour, that is of direct relevance to our fast-expanding audience. Proportionately, we provide the largest local audience of all technology-focused online publishers.

We do not constantly regurgitate press releases to draw in search engine traffic — we believe websites that do so are doing their readers and advertisers a disservice. Nor do we sell “editorial features”, offer advertising “press offices” or rely on online bulletin-board forums of questionable value to advertisers to bolster our traffic.

TechCentral, which is edited and written by award-winning South African journalists, cares about delivering top-quality content to draw in the business and consumer readers that are of most interest to technology advertisers.

We’d like the opportunity to demonstrate the value of directing a portion of your advertising budget to TechCentral, whether your company is in the technology field or not. Numerous opportunities exist for companies interested in reaching our audience of key decision-makers in South Africa’s dynamic information and communications technology sector. We offer packages that will deliver among the best returns on investment available in the online technology news space.

For more information about advertising opportunities, and how your organisation can benefit by publicising itself on TechCentral, please call us on 011-792-0449 during office hours. Or send us an e-mail and ask for our latest rate card and brochure.