Cell C faces competition complaint

Wireless application service providers have resolved to lodge a complaint against Cell C at the Competition Commission after the mobile operator allegedly offered preferential treatment to Blue Label Telecoms. By Duncan McLeod.

Alan Knott-Craig

Alan Knott-Craig

The Wireless Application Service Providers’ Association (Waspa) resolved at its annual general meeting on Thursday to file a complaint against mobile operator Cell C at the Competition Commission over alleged favouritism that industry players say is destabilising the industry.

Waspa members are unhappy that Cell C is allegedly offering Cellfind, a company owned by Blue Label Telecoms, preferential wholesale rates for carrying machine-generated or application-to-person (A2P) SMS traffic. Industry players say this alleged favouritism may stem from the longstanding and close business relationship between Cell C CEO Alan Knott-Craig and brothers Mark and Brett Levy, the founders and co-CEOs of Blue Label.

Mark Levy told TechCentral recently that rival bulk SMS companies were complaining because Cellfind was “giving them a nice run for their money in the marketplace”. He said Blue Label’s bulk SMS business was doing well because of its buying power and ability to “add value to an aggregated offering”, adding that the competition was “healthy” and that rivals needed to “respond with smarter offerings, not by complaining”.

TechCentral understands that Waspa could file the complaint against Cell C as early as next week, despite talks that were scheduled for Friday between its members and the mobile operator. Those talks were set to take place at Cell C’s head office in Sandton.

TechCentral is in possession of a letter penned by Cell C chief legal officer Graham Mackinnon and sent to Waspa chairman Leon Perlman in which he denies that the mobile operator has acted anticompetitively.

“Cell C was conducting a technical trial with one of its Wasps that has been successfully concluded. Any Wasp who sought to conclude an agreement with Cell C during the technical trial phase was advised that until the trial was successfully concluded, Cell C could not take the risk to its network and its business of rolling out a technical solution more widely,” Mackinnon says in the letter.

“Following the technical trial, Cell C has decided to implement a new commercial model for Wasps,” the letter continues. “The terms of this commercial model will be applied in a uniform manner.”

Mackinnon suggests, too, that Waspa is being used as “a vehicle by certain Wasps to advance their own interests”.

“Cell C does not consider there to be any merit in the allegations of anticompetitive activity on its part and will vehemently resist any action that Waspa may bring in this regard.”

But BulkSMS MD Pieter Streicher told TechCentral two weeks ago that Cell C was offering Cellfind something it wasn’t offering other wireless application service providers (Wasps): the ability to send and receive messages to and from any operator using the mobile provider’s network. Other players don’t enjoy this benefit.

“It’s not just about the preferential rate; it’s also about offering additional features like cross-network A2P messages,” Streicher said.

According to Streicher, the Electronic Communications Act requires that service providers all be charged the same wholesale rate.

On Friday, in reply to questions from TechCentral about unhappiness among Waspa members, Knott-Craig said that Cell C was in the process of implementing a new commercial model for Wasps.

“We have invited them to negotiate revised commercial agreements for A2P [messages] to give effect to the new commercial model.”

Knott-Craig said this new model took into account the fact that Cell C has been “pressured into implementing SMS interconnection rates”.

“While Cell C has conceded to interconnect rates on A2P messaging, since these do have a different cost structure, the company has flatly refused to implement person-to-person SMS interconnect rates, which would have increased the cost to consumers.”  — (c) 2013 NewsCentral Media

Share this article

  • Greg Mahlknecht

    Blue Label are well aware it’s not a technical trial, and their claims they differentiate themselves only by their value adds is utter bull – they’ve aggressively been trying to steal customers recently with based on their new preferential rates from CellC, which illustrates that they (a) knew it wasn’t a technical trial, and (b) they don’t even believe their own rubbish excuses about why they’re doing well.

    The silver lining here is that CellC will probably be forced to offer everyone the same low rates to save face, and that might force all the other providers to bring down their SMS rates too.

    As someone in the mobile game, and that have done business with AKC way back in his Vodacom days, I’ve been personally affected and am well aware that nepotism and deals like this that are common for him, this didn’t come as a big surprise to anyone in the industry.

  • The Spark

    I fell for Cell C’s spin about prices etc. which is all good and well.

    But their network quality of service is absolutely apalling! Every single call I make drops. Always “network unavailable” and quality of data service is always up and down between EDGE and HSDPA.

    Called their offices several times and complained but still the same crap service and spin.

    Thankfully I didn’t sign a 24 month contract so I’m moving back to Vodacom.

    Sorry Cell C. FAIL!

  • http://twitter.com/Pasco_e Pascoe

    Blue Label need an anchor network now that their days at Vodacom are numbered. AKC happens to throw them a lifeline. No prizes for guessing why? The rest, we all know. This is sick!

Why TechCentral?

We know that as a prospective advertiser, you are spoilt for choice. Our job is to demonstrate why TechCentral delivers the best return for your advertising spend.

TechCentral is South Africa’s online technology news leader. We don’t say that lightly. We believe we produce the country’s best and most insightful online tech news aimed at industry professionals and those interested in the fast-changing world of technology.

We provide news, reviews and comment, without fear or favour, that is of direct relevance to our fast-expanding audience. Proportionately, we provide the largest local audience of all technology-focused online publishers.

We do not constantly regurgitate press releases to draw in search engine traffic — we believe websites that do so are doing their readers and advertisers a disservice. Nor do we sell “editorial features”, offer advertising “press offices” or rely on online bulletin-board forums of questionable value to advertisers to bolster our traffic.

TechCentral, which is edited and written by award-winning South African journalists, cares about delivering top-quality content to draw in the business and consumer readers that are of most interest to technology advertisers.

We’d like the opportunity to demonstrate the value of directing a portion of your advertising budget to TechCentral, whether your company is in the technology field or not. Numerous opportunities exist for companies interested in reaching our audience of key decision-makers in South Africa’s dynamic information and communications technology sector. We offer packages that will deliver among the best returns on investment available in the online technology news space.

For more information about advertising opportunities, and how your organisation can benefit by publicising itself on TechCentral, please call us on 011-792-0449 during office hours. Or send us an e-mail and ask for our latest rate card and brochure.